Religious Feudalism: Sacralisation, Fanaticism, Absolutism in Al-Azhar’s Interpretation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22452/basirah.vol16no1.1Keywords:
Feudalism, sacralisation, fanaticism, absolutism, Al-Azhar interpretationAbstract
Religious feudalism is a crucial issue because it has morphed into a mental pathology that has infiltrated modern religious authority, creating blind obedience that is often equated with divine obedience. This phenomenon shows that feudalism no longer survives only as an old political structure, but also as a religious culture that sanctifies human authority and weakens public reasoning. Previous studies tend to limit feudalism to an outdated political structure or identity conflict, thus failing to see the aspect of spiritual slavery that kills the critical reasoning of the people. To fill this gap, this study aims to reveal how Tafsir Al-Azhar deconstructs the sacralisation of manipulative authority and exposes the theological mechanisms that normalise submission to human power. To achieve this goal, a qualitative content analysis was conducted on Hamka’s tafsir text, particularly on verses that highlight power relations, leadership, obedience, and social hierarchy. The study found that Hamka systematically dismantled the three pillars of feudalism: the sacralisation of cult figures, the blind fanaticism of taqlid, and the anti-critical arrogance of the religious elite. These findings confirm that domination now survives through the manipulation of emotional dogma rather than just physical coercion. Hamka’s interpretation shows that true obedience must remain tied to tawhid, justice, knowledge, and moral accountability, not to the absolute authority of leaders or inherited traditions. The contribution of this research lies in offering a paradigm of “liberating monotheism” to restore people’s freedom of thought from the shackles of individual cults. This research suggests the need for Islamic education reform based on critical literacy and democratisation of interpretation in order to prevent the reproduction of a slave mentality in the religious sphere.
References
Abdul Rahim, Adibah. “The Concept of Islamic Governance According to HAMKA’s Thought.” Journal of Contemporary Islamic Studies 11, no. 1 (2025): 1-11.
Abou El Fadl, Khaled. Speaking in God’s Name: Islamic Law, Authority and Women. Oxford: Oneworld, 2001.
Armayanto, Harda, Adib Fattah Suntoro, Achmad Reza Hutama Al Faruqi, Maria Ulfa, and Amir Sahidin. “Reviewing Religious Pluralism Through A Qur’anic Approach: The Relevance of Hamka’s Tafsir Al-Azhar in Indonesia and Malaysia.” Afkar: Jurnal Akidah dan Pemikiran Islam 27, no. 2 (2025): 341–380.
Burhani, Ahmad Najib. Heresy and Politics: How Indonesian Islam Deals with Extremism, Pluralism, and Populism. Yogyakarta: Suara Muhammadiyah, 2020.
Federspiel, Howard M. Islam and Ideology in the Emerging Indonesian State: The Persatuan Islam (Persis), 1923 to 1957. Leiden: Brill, 2001.
Hamka, Buya. Tafsir Al-Azhar. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2015.
Herdiawanto, Heri, Valina Singka Subekti, and Firman Noor. “Hamka’s Thoughts on Taqwa Democracy.” Jurnal Penelitian Politik 20, no. 2 (2023): 77–93.
Jamarudin, Ade, Asmal May, and Ofa Ch. Pudin. “The Prospect of Human in the Exegetical Work: A Study of Buya Hamka’s Tafsir al-Azhar.” Ulumuna 23, no. 1 (2019): 1-24.
Kasmuri, Kasmuri, Riki Candra, Abdul Ghofur, and Syamruddin Nasution. “Menimbang Akal dalam Falsafah Hidup Buya Hamka.” Nusantara: Journal for Southeast Asian Islamic Studies 19, no. 2 (2023): 79–93.
Komarudin, Ujang, and Pitut Pramuji. “Between Clientelism and Patrimonialism: Local Politics of the Philippines and Indonesia.” JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) 8, no. 1 (2023): 32–41.
Lears, T. J. Jackson. “The Concept of Cultural Hegemony: Problems and Possibilities.” The American Historical Review90, no. 3 (1985): 567–593.
Mujahidin, Anwar, Muhammad Shohibul Itmam, and Ahmad Choirul Rofiq. “The Dynamic of Contextualization in Indonesian Qur’anic Tafsirs: A Comparative Study of Tafsir Al-Azhar and Tafsir Al-Mishbāh on The Story of The Prophet Moses.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis 25, no. 2 (2024): 221–246.
Osman, Sonny. “Taking Consent for Granted: A Case for Rethinking Hegemony.” Thesis Eleven 187, no. 1 (2025): 116–127.
Rahmawati, Dina. “Permasalahan Feodalisme Tanah di Indonesia.” COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 3, no. 03 (2023): 1–6.
Rosowulan, Titis. “Aspek-Aspek Humanis Pemikiran Keagamaan Hamka.” HIKMATUNA: Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies 1, no. 2 (2015): 1–30.
Rush, James R. Hamka’s Great Story: A Master Writer’s Vision of Islam for Modern Indonesia. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2016.
Sebastian, Leonard C., Syafiq Hasyim, and Alexander R. Arifianto, eds. Rising Islamic Conservatism in Indonesia: Islamic Groups and Identity Politics. Abingdon: Routledge, 2020.
Shomad, Bukhori Abdul, Anwar Mujahidin, and Ahmad Choirul Rofiq. “The Implications of Hamka’s Thoughts in Tafsir Al-Azhar on the Standpoint of Islamic Social Organizations in Preventing Authoritarianism in Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies 14, no. 1 (2024): 91–116.
Yusoff, Zulkifli Mohd, and Abdul Hafiz Abdullah. “Pemimpin Menurut Pandangan HAMKA: Satu Tinjauan Dalam Tafsir Al-Azhar (Leadership According to HAMKA: A Review on Tafsir Al-Azhar).” Jurnal al-Tamaddun 8, no. 1 (2013): 17–38.












